Saying NO to the governments systems of control and spreading TRUTH about our status quo Ξ√ΩLUT↑☼N anyone??

Posts tagged “Fraud

£10 Billion public money to PRIVATE corporations banks

Mark is always going to be welcome here, some call them rant`s I call them need to be said, how fucking much more of their shit can we take eh? how much? not joking, how fucking much?


F1 Hypocrisy Bahrian

FKN NEWS next with a good helping of truth, go get em Deek.


House of Lords $15 trillion fraud

In an amazing twist of events I can now present you with some startling truth that will blow you away (some of you that is), some may recall that I posted a little tale about RBS a few weeks ago linky to that artical https://wakeuporkney.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/rbs-the-truth/ , well in this next vid under the link bellow you will find evidence of my findings plus something more, I offer you this snippet for a taste of some controversy.

“Every day before I start work, but still on company time…. I like to surf the net and try to find my next blog. Well, today I read the mother of mothers from a friend who sent me a very interesting link that at first, I thought couldn’t be true, must be a joke!   BUT NO, a British Lord (James of Blackheath) claims he has proof of a 15 TRILLION $$ swindle, a scam or a fraud. Let’s just quickly look at that number, 150000000000. That is a big number, a number so big that it hurts to imagine all those zeros. Now imagine if you had lost that much money, OUCH. It seems that there is only one man on the planet that can do that; Yohannes Riyadi. If the story is true, then he is by far the richest man on the planet. In fact, if true he pretty much owned and lost the damn place.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.15trillionfraud.co.uk/<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


Gas leak in the North Sea

Hmm another one not in the fucking news!! In an update it is finally in the news but down played as per usual.

Efforts are continuing to control a gas leak from a platform in the Elgin field of the North Sea. Operators Total E&P UK said “a well control problem” occurred on the wellhead platform in the Central Graben area, 240km off Aberdeen, at 12:15.

LINKY>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/site/?pageid=event_desc&edis_id=HZ-20120326-34647-GBR


Basics

Basics from the wonderful Scottish Sovereigns, you will find a link to them just over there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

IT’S AN ILLUSION

Members of parliament are in fact, ”DIRECTORS OF A CORPORATION” which will keep heading in the same direction no matter who is elected.

POLITICS: Pertaining to POLICY, or the ADMINISTRATION of the GOVERNMENT. POLICY: A plan or course of action, as of a GOVERNMENT, POLITICAL PARTY or CORPORATION- a WRITTEN CONTRACT or a CERTIFICATE of INSURANCE.

ACTS of PARLIAMENT become STATUTES; PRIMARY LEGISLATION which in turn are ENACTED and ENFORCED by STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS; SECONDARY LEGISLATION.

COUNCIL TAX is a STATUTORY INSTRUMENT ENACTED on 1st April 1993 under its PRIMARY LEGISLATION the LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1992.

STATUTORY: Created, defined or relating to a STATUTE; conforming to a statute.
INSTRUMENT: A WRITTEN LEGAL document such as a CONTRACT, lease, deed will or bond.

SOCIETY: the SOCIALLY DOMINANT members of a community, a SOCIETY is a number of PERSONS united together by mutual CONSENT, in order to deliberate, determine and act jointly for some COMMON PURPOSE.

CONTRACT: an agreement between two or more PERSONS that CREATES or MODIFIES an existing RELATIONSHIP.
OFFER, CONSIDERATION and ACCEPTANCE must exist for a CONTRACT to be made.

CONSTITUTION; The fundamental RULES, written or unwritten that establishes the CHARACTER of a GOVERNMENT by defining the basic principles to which a SOCIETY must CONFORM.
You were not given a choice if you wanted to join this SOCIETY; it was made for you at a time when you could not express a choice.

STATUTE: A LEGISLATIVE RULE of SOCIETY given the FORCE of law by the CONSENT of the GOVERNED, a RULE, as of a CORPORATION.
STATUTES are not LAWS
From the neuter of Latin: STATUS: The LEGAL CHARACTER or condition of a PERSON or thing. It is totally imaginary, not real.

UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION

The UNITED KINGDOM is a CORPORATION and has employees. The employees are not just civil servants but everyone, if you have a N.I. number you too are an employee of this CORPORATION.

2,

COMPANY POLICY of this CORPORATION requires you, as an EMPLOYEE to pay TAX and follow all the LEGISLATIVE RULES of that CORPORATION in this case STATUTES.
As in any COMPANY, if you break the RULES you will be DISCIPLINED under that COMPANY’S LEGISLATION.

The POLICE of the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION are all COMPANY’S too, run for PROFIT.
As CORPORATE POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS their job is to ENFORCE the RULES of the CORPORATION.

The COURTS of the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION are all COMPANY’S too, if you break the RULES they will invite (SUMMONS) you to their place of business to discuss your punishment, except they are not inviting YOU, you have been deceived into thinking that its YOU they’re inviting.
Even the highest COURT in the land (THE HOUSE OF LORDS) is a CORPORATION.

The POLICEMAN and the CORPORATE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

The POLICE MAN (HUMAN BEING) has a duty under COMMON LAW to serve and protect and uphold the COMMON LAW.
The POLICE OFFICER (FICTION) is a CORPORATE EMPLOYEE a REVENUE COLLECTOR who ENFORCES STATUTES.

You are in COMMON LAW JURISDICTION this means that no CIVIL LAW STATUTE applies unless you CONSENT to it.

POLICE are a COMPANY which exists to make PROFIT. They PROFIT from you by enforcing STATUTES on you, not LAWS, POLICY.

LEGALESE

A language can be created and used by a SOCIETY; a CORPORATION can be such a SOCIETY. LEGALESE is such a language, it is English but some words have VERY different meanings… LEGALESE is the language of the LAW SOCIETY.
Example; MUST is synonymous with MAY (if someone from a CORPORATION says “you MUST” they are actually giving you a choice, because they can’t force you, they are not allowed to because it’s not LAW it’s only POLICY).
Example; SUMMONS is synonymous with INVITATION. When you get a SUMMONS from a COURT of supposedly LAW you are actually being INVITED to a CORPORATE place of business to discuss how much money you are going to give that CORPORATE place of business.
Example; UNDERSTAND is synonymous with STAND UNDER. If I say “do you UNDERSTAND” and you reply “yes” that means you have given me authority over you. It’s as simple as that.

3

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE. Also traded as MAGISTRATES COURTS, every one of them is a CORPORATION running for PROFIT.

If you go to COURT (CORPORATE place of BUSINESS) you are asked immediately for your NAME, they even presume to know who you are and will ask as such…
MR SMITH? — MR is the title of something with LEGAL PERSONALLITY (STATUS)
You were named by your parents but they didn’t call you MR John Smith.
If you reply “yes” to the NAME you have agreed to REPRESENT the FICTIONAL ENTITY with LEGAL PERSONALITY’S i.e. Mr JOHN SMITH/ Mr Smith
A man cannot be acted on by STATUTES, nor can a woman, a flesh and blood human being, STATUTES only apply to the FICTIONAL ENTITY with a LEGAL PERSONALITY’S.
Every TITLE in this land is a FICTION e.g. Mr, LORD, REV etc because it doesn’t apply to a flesh and blood human being, it is the LEGAL STATUS.

NATURAL or COMMON LAW applies to you, inherent LAW. You know inherently what is right or wrong.

COMMERCIAL POLICY (UCC), CIVIL POLICY and POLITICAL POLICY apply to the FICTION but they need the flesh and blood human being to REPRESENT it because the LEGAL PERSONALITY’S does not exist.

A COMPANY exists only because a piece of paper says it does but it’s not REAL.

COMMON LAW vs. STATUTE RULES/POLICY

The only basic principles that any people of any nation need to adhere to are those of NATURAL LAW which are mirrored in COMMON LAW – Never cause HARM or LOSS. This covers every eventuality. COMMON LAW applies to a man or a woman. STATUTE RULES apply to the PERSON only when the man or woman CONSENTS to REPRESENT the PERSON
CONSENT can be given by IN-ACTION as well as ACTION.

Within COMMON LAW exists the word JUSTICE within STATUTE RULES you will just receive SUMMARY JUDGEMENT- you broke the RULES of the CONTRACT- you lose.

You are a man or a woman, you have a PERSON you exist NATURALLY, and you are subject to COMMON LAW JURISDICTION. (JURIS-of law. DICTION-the use of words) you were created by god, nature the divine whatever…..
You must never cause another HARM or LOSS or commit FRAUD.
You have free and unlimited ability to CONTRACT and settle debt in private under COMMERCIAL LAW.

You have been labelled through deception with a fictitious entity the all caps NAME on your birth certificate.

4
The fictitious you was created by GOVERNMENT.
The fictional entity is subject to CIVIL POLICY (TAX etc) under STATUTE.
The fictitious entity does business in the public and is controlled by CIVIL LAW and CORPORATE COURTS.

WHAT IS A PERSON

They are inviting a PERSON created by the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION. Your PERSON was created when your birth was REGISTERED and is evidenced by your BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

Man created GOVERNMENT which in turn created PERSONS. Your PERSON is not you; it is a LEGAL FICTION which you are falsely identifying with because you have been deceived massively. You don’t get to say what its RIGHTS and DUTIES are, the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION does but it has to MISLEAD into doing so by DECEPTION.

DEFINE PERSON

Includes natural PERSON, FIRM. CO-PARTNERSHIP, ASSOCIATION, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY or CORPORATION- LEGAL PERSONALITY’S
(Defining a word with the same word is failing to define anything)
PERSON is defined as a FICTION in black’s law 3rd edition.

THE CREATION OF A PERSON

When you were born your mother/father SUBMITTED a BIRTH CERTIFICATE REGISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
In the FORMULATION of any LIMITED COMPANY/CORPORATION there is always a CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION to create its LEGAL PERSONALITY’S. Your fictional PERSON known as Mr, Mrs or Ms is created by the same means

SUBMIT A REGISTRATION APPLICATION

When you SUBMIT you are bending to another’s will.
When you REGISTER you are handing over LEGAL TITLE of what you are REGISTERING to whoever you are REGISTERING it to, you are REGISTERING to ACKNOWLEDGING or TRANSFERRING the AUTHORITY to another by this PROCESS.
When you APPLY, which means to beg, the assumption is made that you know exactly what you are begging for by whom or what you are APPLYING to and you know exactly what you are willing to give up for it, and most of the time you VOLUNTEERED your APPLICATION and you were not forced to APPLY.

BIRTH CERTIFICATE. How the PERSON is created as a “BONDED SLAVE”

You get a CERTIFIED COPY you don’t get the ORIGINAL.
NAME of the PERSON being created- CAPITALISED SURNAME is a FICTION

5

NAME of PERSON father/mother CAPITALISED SURNAMES is the INFORMANT, they have the QUALIFICATION needed to be able to INFORM on the child being born.
At the bottom of the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a DECLARATION, a declaration is in COMMON LAW (a sworn oath of a man or woman) a DECLARATION from a man or woman to prove a man or woman was PRESENT to REPRESENT the PERSON needed to create the new PERSONS LEGAL PERSONALITY’S.

Then you REGISTER the BIRTH CERTIFICATE to a CORPORATION the GENERAL REGISTER OFFICE.

REGISTRATION AND YOUR CHILDREN

To this day REGISTRATION still means the same thing i.e. the TRANSFER of LEGAL TITLE to the body you have REGISTERED it with.
As you have seen the worst possible way that this process could have been abused is in the REGISTRATION of BIRTHS
A simple show of how your child no longer belongs to you is this; mandatory vaccinations, mandatory schooling, holidaying the children when they say you can and not before…..they tell you how to manage their PROPERTY and if you don’t do it their way their APPOINTED GUARDIANS take your children away: the SOCIAL SERVICES PLC a CORPORATION.
You have no claim whatsoever to your children because you’ve been duped.

PLEASE CONSIDER THIS

Could the GOVERNMENT take your car away and crush it LAWFULLY if you actually owned it? It would be totally UNLAWFUL so in the process of REGISTERING your vehicle they dupe you into handing over LEGAL TITLE of that vehicle (ownership) and you get a V5 DOCUMENT as the REGISTERED KEEPER (a PERMISSION to use it as long as it is used in ACCORDANCE with all their RULES) If they did not dupe you into this the very ACT of taking and crushing your PROPERTY would be a CRIME in COMMON LAW. Also by REGISTERING it you, as STATED AGREE to ABIDE by their RULES and do so in their SOCIETY, this is how they LEVY the fuel DUTY, road TAX, MOT REQUIREMENT.
You then REGISTER it to another CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT also traded as DVLA.

PLEASE REMEMBER

When you REGISTER something, anything, you give up ownership of it and instead you get a CERTIFICATE OF TITLE, this is worthless and this is why you own nothing not even your children, house, car etc.

FIXED PENALTY NOTICES issued by CORPORATIONS

6

So why are there so many FIXED PENALTY NOTICES being given for the most ludicrous reasons? Parking in a place a CORPORATION deems you can’t. Speed cameras’, not completing a SORN the list is endless, but what are these NOTICES in the real world being ISSUED by these CORPORATIONS which never stop dreaming up reasons for PENALISING you. PENALISED by way of FORFIET: (something surrendered or subject to surrender as a punishment for a breach of CONTRACT)
FPN: An OFFER to accept an ADHESION CONTRACT.
ADHESION CONTRACT: A type of CONTRACT a LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT between two PARTIES to do a certain thing in which one side has all the bargaining power and uses it to write the CONTRACT primarily to his, her or its advantage.
A NOTICE is not a BILL, a NOTICE is not a DEMAND, and A NOTICE is nothing more than an OFFER to discuss the CONTRACT the OFFERER is trying to force upon your PERSON. This is simply a tool for REVENUE COLLECTION.
The true reason why these FPNs are forced upon your PERSON is simply to maintain the ILLUSION that they have control over your LIFE, FORTUNE, and FREEDOM because you FEAR their ability to take away from you something you deem valuable.

LAWFUL REBELLION

Peacefully resist all claims against your PERSON by refusing to CONSENT to the CORPORATIONS POLICY
Always ask when stopped by a POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICER “Am I OBLIGED to answer your questions” “Under what AUTHORITY and what LAW are you ACTING” if they say to you “Its under this or that LAW” and you can prove its only an ACT or STATUTE, remind them that “failure to differentiate between a STATUTE and LAW is GROSS NEGLIGENCE which is equivalent to the COMMON LAW CRIME of FRAUD. This applies to anyone who tries to enforce a STATUTE upon you no matter who they are.

YOU ARE A MAN/WOMAN IN LAWFUL REBELLION YOU ARE NOT A PERSON

You are a man or a woman you are not a PERSON The legal world is the same as your PERSON it is a FICTION an ILLUSION that does not exist in the REAL WORLD That is why the CORPORATE EMPLOYEES must get the man or woman to REPRESENT the PERSON before a contract can be formed. They will ask you your NAME and ADDRESS and if you give it to them they will have JOINDER
There is no LAW saying you have to give your NAME and ADDRESS, if you do give it to them you have said “yes I am the PERSON
Remember, there is no JUSTICE in this country only SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, for every COURT, even the highest in the land is a FOR PROFIT CORPORATION which is part of THE UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION.


The Greek Experiment

The Real News Network is always a great place to visit for truthful reporting, and this next vid proves that.


Anonymous:- Address To The Governmen Of Greece – You Should’ve Expected Us

Just fucking watch it eh!!


HOLLIE GREIG

This has just hit my inbox. (for background info go to the links bellow)

An open email, to the First Minister, calling for a public inquiry
Posted on February 4, 2012 by webmaster
I have just received an email from Anne (yes, her own email), asking me to put this open email up on the site.
An open email, to the First Minister, calling for a public inquiry.
by Ian McFerran on Saturday, 4 February 2012 at 15:49
Mr Salmond,
This is an open email to you, calling for a public inquiry into the allegations made by HOLLIE GREIG and the conduct of yourself, your Ministers and others throughout this case, since the year 2000.
You will recall that I have contacted you many times in respect of the corruption of your Ministers and Office, not least your Minister known as The Lord Advocate (now Dame) Elish Angiolini QC. I formally placed you on notice, via a Freedom of Information request, on 28th January 2011 with the questions repeated below (similar questions being sent to the, then, Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini), none of which were answered by your Office of the Office of the Lord Advocate. This lead to the Information Commissioner becoming involved, forcing your Office to comply with my request or face charges of Contempt of Court. Your reply was week, to say the least, claiming, as your Office did, not to have knowledge or record of such matters.
The questions to your Office were:
1.When did you first become aware of the allegations made by Hollie Greig about her being abused by members of a high-ranking paedophile ring in Scotland?
2.What actions, if any, did you take after becoming aware of Hollie Greig’s allegations?
3.What action does your Office – or you – intend taking regarding the inaction of your Government’s, then Procurator Fiscal and now Lord Advocate, Mrs Elish Angiolini, thereby placing other children at risk of abuse by this alleged paedophile ring?
4.What action does your Office – or you – intend taking in respect of Mrs Angiolini proven attempts to cover-up this specific case related to Hollie Greig? You will be aware of the attempts of your Lord Advocate to cover-up this case due to the emails I and many others have been sending to you and copying you into, which contained links to comments, speeches and letters made by Robert Green and his supporters. The information contained in those emails, for the best part of a year, clearly demonstrate the Lord Advocate’s involvement in this most despicable of cover-ups. Please feel free to review my previous emails to you for assistance in answering this point and the previous point.
5.Why have you not replied to my persistent email requests for your involvement, as the First Minister for Scotland, to bring a criminal investigation or instigate a public enquiry into the lack of a proper ‘full’ Police investigation in this matter where the witnesses and accused are actually questioned rather than either ignored or left to go about their business, respectively?
6.When can the Scottish people expect to see their First Minister act to amend the public perception of non-action by you and your Office, which amounts to a dereliction of duty and bringing the reputation of a public office into disrepute?
It is worth noting that, in respect of questions 3, 4 and 6, to date, NOTHING has been done. As such, children and vulnerable adults remain at risk due to your apparent lack of interest of concern for them.
On Tuesday 17th January 2012, in Stonehaven Open Court, it was clearly established that Grampian Police Force had failed in their sworn legal duty to fully and thoroughly investigate the claims made to them by Hollie Greig in respect of a high-ranking paedophile ring operating within the Scottish borders and apparently being protected by members of the Scottish legal system, ‘special needs’ education system, medical and social welfare professions. The case in question was that of Robert Green who had been charged with Breach of the Peace (SH10000189) and found guilty by Sheriff Bowen, who has been professionally associated with one of the key witnesses, Elish Angiolini, since at least December 2001.
In case the information hasn’t reached your Office yet, Sheriff Bowen denied Robert Green the opportunity to question two key prosecution witnesses, one of which was his professional associate for more than ten years (Angiolini) and also denied Robert Green the chance to speak freely in his own defence under oath by preventing Robert Green from making a statement in his defence. Innocently, Sheriff Bowen also refused to confirm or deny whether he was a Freemason at the start of the trial.
The allegations made by Hollie Greig were done so, formally, to Grampian Police Force in the year 2000 and again, formally, in 2009 – that time witnessed by Robert Green – who now faces sentencing from a Sheriff who is strongly suspected of being a Freemason, who failed to declare his professional association with a key witness and who denied the accused the chance to question witnesses or speak freely in his own defence.
Given you have been aware of the entire case related to Hollie Greig on numerous occasions and by numerous sources, as well as the ongoing persecution of Robert Green by your Lord Advocate and Grampian Police Force, and that you are now in possession of facts which bring into question the honesty and integrity of your judicial system (Sheriff Bowen), I now demand that you stop protecting your corrupt friends in the Scottish Government and legal/law-enforcement professions and establish a full public inquiry into the allegations made by Hollie Greig (which, as established in Open Court, to date, have never been properly investigated) and also into the persecution of Robert Green.
This email has been copied very widely and I hereby encourage others to do likewise and approach you and your Office with a similar request as this is a matter of great public interest – especially as Dame Angiolini is now a suspect in a criminal investigation into the misappropriation of public funds directly related to the case of Hollie Greig.
Mr Salmond, the case of Hollie Greig will NOT go away! The more you and your corrupt friends try to cover it up, the deeper the hole you are digging for yourselves and the louder and louder the public will shout. To end this matter, there is only ONE option open to you, as a pubic servant – a public inquiry!
I have one final question to put to you and your Office, does the Scottish Government, headed by you, still feel that Elish Angiolini is worthy of her Dame-hood?
I await your response within 14 consecutive days. I trust I will not have to involve the Information Commissioner again.
Yours,
Ian McFerran
UPDATE ALERT:
UK Column newsletter] ALERT – Robert Green given 1 year in Scottish prison following rigged trial |
inquiringminds.cc/uk-column-newsletter-alert-robe…

Freemen on The Land UK info. (Mirror)

Thank you Mark, fucking thank you for this vid friend, and thank you to http://www.youtube.com/user/dmurphy25 for the work he has done and is doing.

 


RBS The TRUTH

COPY THIS INFORMATION AND INFORM EVERYONE HERE IN THE UK 

In light of what your government and media have told you in regards of RBS, YOU HAVE BEEN DISTRACTED, sheep would be a word well used around this blog for you (not nice eh? grow up and wake up!) but the truth was never meant to pull any punches was it, so now its time to do something about it, now its YOUR turn, just do as requested above the nice little photo and you can’t go wrong.

So far, all that most of you know in the news right now is that a certain Mr Stephen Hester (as shown bellow) and his buddy Sir Philip Hampton (<< under link) both “gave back” their fucking huge bonuses, and you would be right, but all of that is fuck all compared to what I am about to share with you.

As ever here if you see something highlighted in BLUE its a link for you to discover what I am talking about, all links here are as safe as can be (I found them safe anyway) and will open a new window or tab so you don’t lose this page.

Ok so enough with the trivial stuff and onto the nitty-gritty, the current total UK GDP is currently about 2.2 Trillion dollars  (according to the World Bank), now hold that thought.

The UK Taxpayer own`s 83% of RBS, also a thought to be holding on to.

So we bailed them out to the tune of AT-LEAST  £142 billion which is 223.6784 US$ and we own 83% of RBS, wow, just fucking wow, but wait we are missing something, something you have not been told.

In the years 2007 to 2011 the Federal Reserve Bank gave RBS a little bit of cash to (how much you say), £350 fucking billion which is 541 billion US$ (yes that’s right, over half a trillion dollars)  that’s how much, now back to those thoughts you have been holding, go, go now.

Back so soon?

Did you want proof?

Here have a link to the Federal Reserve Banks own report, has it hit you yet? Let me make it easy for you (again) see pick bellow.

If you never read anything again, read these next two;

Bank of England

Bail outs total

Yay!! you made it this far!!, so what question do you need to be asking your-self right about now? may I make a suggestion? Why the fuck are we suffering with high unemployment, high prices, can’t get a loan, can’t get a mortgage but to name a few, when this one fucking bank got a minimum of ONE FUCKING TRILLION between us and the Fed????? for fucks sake!!

Sorry, my well deserved rant is now over.

Do you still care about that 1 million quid bonus?

If yes, you are not paying attention, if no (well done), spread this far and wide.

And now for some links.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/nov/12/bank-bailouts-uk-credit-crunch

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jan/25/uk-gdp-what-economists-say?newsfeed=true

http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/debt_brief.php

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/inflationreport/infrep.htm


Comprehend This !!

Bellow you will find a small eye watering snippet from the Federal Reserve, all amounts are in TRILLIONS & BILLIONS, try to understand the implications of those amounts, try to understand that YOU will be paying for them, in the case of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) we tax payers are meant to be the ones who bailed them out? we are certainly responsible for its debts I recommend you download the full pdf (found at the end of this post), go to page 131 and take it all in, 16 trillion dollars is more than the GDP of America, hell its more than the total GDP America has made in over 200+ years.

A huge read can be found >>>> here <<<< which will explain some hard-hitting TRUTHS to you, everything you thought you knew is a lie, read it or ignore it, it’s up to you, this truth will scare the crap out of you, but know this, it’s all about to end this information has been kept from you to protect a system that sucks money straight from you its theft on a global scale.

You wont find any of this mentioned in the press, this is the biggest thing you will read so far this year, I strongly suggest you follow the link above and research this, you wont be disappointed, actual documents can be found here >>>>PROOF<<<<

These bailouts date from 2007 onwards to now.

Citigroup: $2.5 trillion ($2,500,000,000,000)

Morgan Stanley: $2.04 trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)

Merrill Lynch: $1.949 trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)

Bank of America: $1.344 trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)

Barclay’s PLC (United Kingdom): $868 billion ($868,000,000,000) Fuck me that’s huge!!

Bear Sterns: $853 billion ($853,000,000,000)

Goldman Sachs: $814 billion ($814,000,000,000)

Royal Bank of Scotland (UK): $541 billion ($541,000,000,000) “OMG”

JP Morgan Chase: $391 billion ($391,000,000,000)

Deutsche Bank (Germany): $354 billion ($354,000,000,000)

UBS (Switzerland): $287 billion ($287,000,000,000) Credit Suisse

(Switzerland): $262 billion ($262,000,000,000)

Lehman Brothers: $183 billion ($183,000,000,000)

Bank of Scotland (United Kingdom): $181 billion ($181,000,000,000) “I feel faint”

BNP Paribas (France): $175 billion ($175,000,000,000)

FULL PDF on GAO server: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11696.pdf

Page 131


Anonymous Message to the 99%

This seems to be aimed at those who did not know (in part anyway), the vid comes from The Amorphous Council of Autonomous Beings.


UK or Africa?

This one just had to be passed along, “UK death rate similar to African nations” according to the office of national statistics, that just blew me away! but how surprised am I really, knowing that the whole fucking place is just a dedication to the corporations that really run the country.

The article is from PressTV with a few snippets here for your consideration.

“The rate of mortality in the poorest areas of Britain is reportedly as high as in some crisis-hit African nations, official figures have revealed.”

“According to the records released by Office for National Statistics (ONS), the death rate in the country’s most isolated parts is as high as 1,500 deaths per 100,000 people in one year.”

“However, the rate of mortality in Rwanda, in central and eastern Africa, is 1,427 and in Botswana, in southern Africa, is 1,452, World Health Organization reported.”

“They also declare that poor diet and air pollution affect the lives of people living in the country’s crisis hit areas.”

Its fucking out-bastard-standing to know that some of our own UK folk have it only slightly better than some of the worlds most vulnerable.

What ever the cause of this statistic matters not really, I used to live in some of those areas mentioned and can tell you first hand that a combination of poverty and pollution is to blame, what does matter though is the fact that none of us really know whats hidden buried beneath our feet, it’s all hush-hush, you can bet that our government know though, but add into that social deprivation and you have a vision of our future, good eh!!


UK to close borders

Sounds more like war to me, what do you think??


The Shocking TRUTH of the Pending European Union Collapse!

What do you want? it does not come with pleasure that I report our impending doom (no really).

Just a small quote from here http://www.zerohedge.com/ yea ok its the full thing, but go there you might learn something.

“While certainly humorous, entertaining and very, very childish, the recent war of words between France and Britain has the potential to become the worst thing to ever happen to Europe.

Actually, make that the world and modern civilization. Why? Because while we sympathize with England, and are stunned by the immature petulant response from France and its head banker Christian Noyer to the threat of an imminent S&P downgrade of its overblown AAA rating, the truth is that France is actually 100% correct in telling the world to shift its attention from France and to Britain. So why is this bad.

Because as the chart below shows, if there is anything the global financial system needs, is for the rating agencies, bond vigilantes, and lastly, general public itself, to realize that the UK’s consolidated debt (non-financial, financial, government and household) to GDP is… just under 1000%. That’s right: the UK debt, when one adds to its more tenable sovereign debt tranche all the other debt carried on UK books (and thus making the transfer of private debt to the public balance sheet impossible), is nearly ten times greater than the country’s GDP.

To call that “game over” is an insult to game overs everywhere. So here’s the bottom line: France should quietly and happily accept a downgrade, because the worst that could happen would be a few big French banks collapsing, and that’s it. If, on the other hand, the UK becomes the center of attention (recall this is the same UK that allows unlimited rehypothecation of worthless assets, and the same UK that unleashed the juggernaut known as AIG-FP’s Joe Cassano – after all there is a reason why the UK has 600% its GDP in financial liabilities – financial innovation always goes there where it is least regulated), then this island, which far more so than the US is the true center of the global banking ponzi scheme, will suddenly find itself at the mercy of the market. At that point the only question is whether the vigilantes will dare to take down the UK, as said take down will result in an implosion in the very fabric of modern finance, much more so than what even a full collapse of France could ever achieve, or if due to the certain Mutual Assured Destruction that would follow a coordinated UK onslaught, the market will simply very quietly proceed to ignore the elephant in the room.”

We are so so fucked.

 

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages/video may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, economic, DEMOCRACY, scientific, MORAL, ETHICAL, and SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational.