Mark is always going to be welcome here, some call them rant`s I call them need to be said, how fucking much more of their shit can we take eh? how much? not joking, how fucking much?
This next vid is a little education about money and how we ended up where we are now, at this point I would like you all to consider that everything that is and has happened to us was planned, it`s called PROBLEM REACTION SOLUTION, so let me explain it to you;
The PTB created certain conditions to profit from and reduce the populations of those useless eater`s, they did this by creating a boom time where everybody had plenty to go round, and everybody was quite happy, but this was all part of their plan, at that stage they were already moving their wealth about and betting on a global depression, I say global because un-like us these fuckers can go where they want any time they like.
The next stage of their plan is the actual near crash of the , market`s, they own everything, any way so that part was easy especially seeing`s the sheep would end up paying in the name of saving the economy, add into that growing oppression and blatant in your face stupid decisions designed to anger you, all of that and more is in part the PROBLEM.
Now things get interesting, global discontent is now filtering across to include the middle classes and the separation of the elites and the rest of us is evident to most of the population, peaceful protest is and will eventually turn to rioting and civil war, no country will be immune from this, but of course that is exactly what the PTB want, that is the REACTION part of the plan.
WWIII may also be part of the plan, when enough people have died and humans are in a deep state of despair, the uncommonly silent PTB will now start to voice solutions beneficial to themselves and we will also believe that their ideas may be beneficial to us to, that will be the SOLUTION part.
ITS ALL A GAME, THEIR GAME, AND WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO WIN, but a change in consciousness is now starting to filter in to the global population and if enough people can educate them-selves into the truth we may just stand a chance.
In an amazing twist of events I can now present you with some startling truth that will blow you away (some of you that is), some may recall that I posted a little tale about RBS a few weeks ago linky to that artical https://wakeuporkney.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/rbs-the-truth/ , well in this next vid under the link bellow you will find evidence of my findings plus something more, I offer you this snippet for a taste of some controversy.
“Every day before I start work, but still on company time…. I like to surf the net and try to find my next blog. Well, today I read the mother of mothers from a friend who sent me a very interesting link that at first, I thought couldn’t be true, must be a joke! BUT NO, a British Lord (James of Blackheath) claims he has proof of a 15 TRILLION $$ swindle, a scam or a fraud. Let’s just quickly look at that number, 150000000000. That is a big number, a number so big that it hurts to imagine all those zeros. Now imagine if you had lost that much money, OUCH. It seems that there is only one man on the planet that can do that; Yohannes Riyadi. If the story is true, then he is by far the richest man on the planet. In fact, if true he pretty much owned and lost the damn place.”
Holy fuck !! have a look at this vid, I hope its true, please please let it be true.
Never surprised at what I find these days, trying my best to find the right word to describe them, oh yea “fuckers” the lot of them.
This in from http://nominedeus.wordpress.com/
If there was ever any doubt that the government are all crooks, just read this letter and slap your-self in the face for not doing anything about it.
Oh and fuck me you need to be watching the vid at the end of this post, just watch it, hell if you never come here again just watch this one little vid.
The House of
Each house of parliament has a common law cognisance to run its own business, in its own way; neither house can by Common Law interfere in the internal working of the other house.
This is the constitutional settlement placed upon parliament by our forefathers, and described in the Prerogatives of the King by Sir Mathew Hale 1713 Chief Justice of the Kings Bench. And F W Maitland Late Downing Professor of the Laws of England in the University of Cambridge. At the university press 1908.
Sir Edward Coke Chief Justice of the Kings Bench 1628 ruled that parliament may some times pass a law which is repugnant or impossible to perform in which case the common law will intercede and strike it down. Giving the Common Law the status of higher law than statute law.
There are a number of cases of the cognisance of the commons to conduct its own business its own way, but I have not been able to find one case which deals with either house interfering in the running of the other house. Yet this is exactly what the House of Commons has done to the House of Lords, they started this process in 1661 after the restoration of King Charles II when the Commons told the Lords they could not amend a money bill only accept it or reject it, the commons were claiming without any legal authority, complete autonomy in all things financial. This was the commons interfering with the cognisance of the upper house to do its job of scrutinising legislation. For some inexplicable reason the Lords accepted this state of affairs. This was the precursor to all the subsequent parliament acts.
In 1910 Asquith put forward a money bill and the upper house being erroneously of the opinion that they had no authority to amend this bill rejected it. In fact the upper house had the common law right to amend it and return the amended bill to the commons for approval.
As a result Asquith put forward the first parliament act which limited the authority of the upper house, Asquith told the upper house if they did not consent to this bill he would put 500 new Peers into the hose who would vote for its abolition, when this bill to restrict the upper house was submitted to King Edward VII he refused the assent on the grounds it was unconstitutional and removed a protection from his subjects. In fact it interfered with the cognisance of the upper house to perform its duties in the manor laid down by the constitutional and common laws of England, these laws are so good they have travelled to every common law jurisdiction in the world. Even Talleyrand our sworn enemy said when the English Constitution goes freedom goes.
King Edward VII fell ill and died, and on coming to the Throne King George V was told by a government minister he keeps all his prerogatives but may not use any of them unless he has the backing of a government minister. This principle is unknown to our constitutional or common law. The assent was given to the 1911 Parliament Act which effectively weakened the authority of the upper house but with no constitutional or common law authority for the commons to even contemplate such a move. The mere fact they are the elected house does not authorise their actions. Because at no time have the public been put in the constitutional picture, which would allow them to make an informed decision. As to whether they wish to weaken the upper house in this or any other way. In fact Asquith toured the country slanting the true position so much as to be an outright lie.
The 1948 Parliament Act was yet another interference with the cognisance of the upper house to perform its constitutional duties, as our forefathers set it up. Once again this was done without the benefit of law, nor is there any justifiable legal principle which can be quoted to justify the unjustifiable.
The 1998 House of Lords Act by the same token interferes with the cognisance of the upper house to determine itself who does or does not sit in the upper house. This is a clear breach of the constitutional arrangements of parliament and is contrary to constitutional and common law.
Each of the above acts has subverted the constitutional arrangements of parliament; this is the major crime of Sedition at Common Law, and at this level of Sedition an act of High Treason.
The letters patent as granted to a Baron of the realm are such as to be a clear and lawful order from the King, to the recipient of the letter patent to undertake certain duties on the Kings behalf, it is clear that the King can not possibly know or understand every thing put before him, he should have a good general understanding of his Kingdom, his subjects, and world affairs. But there will always be occasions when his knowledge or understanding will fall short of allowing him without assistance from reaching the right decision. In order that he has a ready source of advisors who are good and capable men, he uses those peers of the realm that he or his ancestors have appointed to Baronetcies, and the letters patent represent a lawful order from the King to the holder of the Letters Patent to undertake this work. They instruct the holder of the Letters Patent that he must sit in the upper house of parliament and scrutinise legislation passing through the parliament to ensure it is in the best interests of the country and his subjects, it further gives a lawful order to the holder of the letters Patent that he is to act as an advisor to the King. In short the King requires those with the best available knowledge and experience to advise him as to the best course of action under any circumstances.
England is a Monarchy and we all owe a duty of loyalty and obedience to our lawfully anointed sovereign, the letters patent are by our laws to be obeyed.
For any one who ever they may be, whatever position they hold within the Kingdom be they farm labour or Prime Minister to come between the King and the holder of the letters patent so as to prevent the holder from carrying out the lawful commands of the King is for that person to set himself above the King. That by our law is an act of High Treason contrary to the Common Law of England and the 1351 Treason Act.
I respectfully submit that is just what Anthony Blair did when he put through the 1998 House of Lords Act. He in effect set Her Majesty’s lawful order to those hereditary peers sat in the upper house at nought thereby imagining the death of Her Majesty as a Sovereign Queen. Contrary to Common Law and the 1351 Treason Act.
He also removed Her Majesty’s honour as a Sovereign Queen by assuming he had a greater authority in this Kingdom than Her Majesty. Contrary to Common Law and the 1848 Treason Felony Act.
I would like you to explain to me why I should comply with any law passed in Parliament since 1911 because since that day parliament has not been properly constructed according to the tripartite agreement set in place by our forefathers, and as such it has no mandate to pass any legislation.
I would further request that for every hereditary peer removed from the upper house, under the 1998 House of Lords Act. A warrant should be issued for the arrest of Anthony Linton Blair one time Prime Minister of the United Kingdom on a charge of High Treason for imagining the death of the Anointed Queen of England Queen Elizabeth II Contrary to Common Law and the 1351 Treason Act.
- Congressional and Parliamentary Systems of Government (socyberty.com)
- A Middle Way for the Upper House? (politicsontoast.com)
- Act of Parliament (englishlearnersweb.wordpress.com)
Dom talks law with the police
Oh boy, this fella had me smiling from ear to ear, it’s the first I have heard from Dom and hell he`s good, he has confidence and works in a peaceful manner, but just look at the results eh! look at the faces on the coppers he talks to, talk about the penny dropping this is priceless and pur gold so spread far and wide, and always question authority, the second vid has a few slight sound problems but its well worth sitting through for some gobsmaking gems, vid three is oh so good and makes me feel glad that I am part of this movement.
Dom Talks to Uniforms
Fun in london with the anti terrorist police and Dom
Same goes for us here in the UK to, educate your selves!!
This is for my friends over in Greece, good luck with your action today.
The root of the problem is right here, but we already know this right? So what the hell are we going to do about it? oh yea I know what we will do, absolutely fuck all as usual.
For those who doubted my statement concerning the UK police, the police have been cleared of any wrong doing in the Jody McIntyre case, watch the vid below for a refresher.
Just watched this great vid from good old Pat, this one is nothing to do with the god squad and contains a powerful message.
For some reason yet unknown, today has been one of finding fellow truthers right here in the UK, I am amazed to find them all over the place all at a time when I thought our numbers were dropping, wow was I fucking way out on that, our numbers are growing and growing fast, subjects that took me years to discover are now getting to be common knowledge, and with the help of great humans like this http://www.youtube.com/user/whytesapph I can see things becoming main-stream sooner than I thought.
So for those new to these subjects, come on friends what are you waiting for, the truth WILL set you FREE.
Just a note before you watch this next vid, if you still have hangups over your programmed view of muslims/arabs try to get it out of your head before you watch, this vid is NOT about them.
The issues raised here are heated and important to us all with three very differing views, my personal opinion is not important here, what matters is yours.
- ‘thinking to protest’ (wakeuporkney.wordpress.com)
- UK – England – People arrested for PRE – CRIME – “conspiracy to commit a crime” – first the thought police and now PRE CRIME (txlady706.wordpress.com)
- Charlie Veitch, of the Love Police, Still In Police Custody, Taken To London (thetruthiswhere.wordpress.com)
- The Arrest of Charlie Veitch (merovee.wordpress.com)
- Filmmaker suing province, police over G20 arrest (thestar.com)
- You: Anti-royals criticise police tactics (guardian.co.uk)
- “I am a Palestinian”, says Charlie Veitch after solitary confinement in Toronto and prison in London (wewhoopposedeception.wordpress.com)
- Anarchists threaten to disrupt royal wedding (cnn.com)
- Police should consider apologising to Veitch – IPCA (3news.co.nz)
- Royal wedding: masked anarchists thwarted by police (telegraph.co.uk)